Optimizing Digital Image Quality Assessment: Format Selection and Methods

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Aug 16, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22362/ijcert/2023/v10/i08/v10i082
Keywords:
Image Quality Evaluation, File Format Selection, Quality Assessment Methods, Compression Techniques, Graphics Library Development, Format-Related Challenges

Main Article Content

Kayithi Varshitha
B.Tech Student ,Department of Computer Science & Engineering, CVR College of Engineering, Rangareddy Dist, Telangana, India
Battina Sneha Sree
B.Tech Student ,Department of Computer Science & Engineering, CVR College of Engineering, Rangareddy Dist, Telangana, India
Salikuti Varunika Reddy
B.Tech Student ,Department of Computer Science & Engineering, CVR College of Engineering, Rangareddy Dist, Telangana, India
Semarla Sreeja Reddy
B.Tech Student ,Department of Computer Science & Engineering, CVR College of Engineering, Rangareddy Dist, Telangana, India
K Venkatesh Sharma
Professor, Department of Computer Science & Engineering, CVR College of Engineering, Rangareddy Dist, Telangana, India

Abstract

The evaluation of computer-stored digital image quality currently relies on subjective measures based on user preferences. The landscape includes a plethora of diverse file formats with unique features that can either enhance or detract from image quality. Selecting the optimal format is a challenge for both average users and system developers, requiring a comprehensive understanding of available formats, their attributes, implications on image quality, and the specific image data they will handle. This places undue stress on users, potentially leading to unsuitable format choices. Consequently, making an informed initial decision becomes paramount. This study aims to identify prevalent quality assessment methods used in related industries for images stored across a range of file formats, and to propose effective implementation strategies. Drawing upon insights from these methods and delving into popular file formats and compression techniques, I propose practical suggestions on a general level. In a bid to enhance my comprehension of format-related challenges and their impact on image quality, a key aspect of this research involves developing a graphics library. This software component facilitates seamless conversion between numerous popular graphics formats, thereby fortifying the understanding of format issues and compression/storage effects on image quality.

Article Details

How to Cite
[1]
Kayithi Varshitha, Battina Sneha Sree, Salikuti Varunika Reddy, Semarla Sreeja Reddy, and K Venkatesh Sharma, “Optimizing Digital Image Quality Assessment: Format Selection and Methods”, Int. J. Comput. Eng. Res. Trends, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 11–19, Aug. 2023.
Issue
Vol. 10 No. 8 (2023): August (2023) Issue
Section
Research Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

IJCERT Policy:

The published work presented in this paper is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. This means that the content of this paper can be shared, copied, and redistributed in any medium or format, as long as the original author is properly attributed. Additionally, any derivative works based on this paper must also be licensed under the same terms. This licensing agreement allows for broad dissemination and use of the work while maintaining the author's rights and recognition.

By submitting this paper to IJCERT, the author(s) agree to these licensing terms and confirm that the work is original and does not infringe on any third-party copyright or intellectual property rights.

 

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

Fan, Zhigang, and Ricardo L. De Queiroz. "Identification of bitmap compression history: JPEG detection and quantizer estimation." IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 12.2 (2003): 230-235.

Faircloth, B. C. (2006). GMCONVERT: file conversion for GENEMAPPER output files. Molecular Ecology Notes, 6(4), 968-970.

Chandler, D. M. (2013). Seven challenges in image quality assessment: past, present, and future research. International Scholarly Research Notices, 2013.

Dathan, C. S. (2017). Land evaluation and land use planning in Eruthavoor watershed of Western Ghat region using GIS and remote sensing (Doctoral dissertation, Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, College of Agriculture, Vellayani).

Basha, S. S., & Prasad, K. S. (2009). Segmentation of Medical Images Using Morphological Image Processing. i-Manager's Journal on Future Engineering and Technology, 4(3), 37.

Wiggins, R. H., Davidson, H. C., Harnsberger, H. R., Lauman, J. R., & Goede, P. A. (2001). Image file formats: past, present, and future. Radiographics, 21(3), 789-798

Karima, M., Sadhal, K., & McNeil, T. (1985). From paper drawings to computer-aided design. IEEE computer graphics and applications, 5(02), 27-39.

Sharifinejad, A., & Mehrpour, H. (2001, October). A novel bitmap based matching criterion for MPEG video coding. In Proceedings. Ninth IEEE International Conference on Networks, ICON 2001. (pp. 20-24). IEEE.

Lien, C. Y., Teng, H. C., Chen, D. J., Chu, W. C., & Hsiao, C. H. (2009). A Web-based solution for viewing large-sized microscopic images. Journal of digital imaging, 22, 275-285.

Salomon, D. (2007). A concise introduction to data compression. Springer Science & Business Media.

Storer, J. A. (1987). Data compression: methods and theory. Computer Science Press, Inc..

Golomb, S. (1966). Run-length encodings (corresp.). IEEE transactions on information theory, 12(3), 399-401.

Kinsner, W., & Greenfield, R. H. (1991, May). The Lempel-Ziv-Welch (LZW) data compression algorithm for packet radio. In [Proceedings] WESCANEX'91 (pp. 225-229). IEEE.

Moffat, A. (2019). Huffman coding. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 52(4), 1-35.

Howard, P. G., & Vitter, J. S. (1994). Arithmetic coding for data compression. Proceedings of the IEEE, 82(6), 857-865.