A Supermodularity-Based approach for Data Privacy using Differential Privacy Preserving Algorithm

Main Article Content

Alisam Pavan Kumar
U.Veeresh
Dr S.Prem Kumar

Abstract

Now a day the maximizing of data usage and minimizing privacy risk are two conflicting goals. The organization required set of transformation at the time of release data. While determining the best set of transformations has been the focus on the extensive work in the database community, the scalability and privacy are major problems while data transformation. Scalability and privacy risk of data anonymization can be addressed by using differential privacy. Differential privacy provides a theoretical formulation for privacy. A scalable algorithm is use to find the differential privacy when applying specific random sampling. The risk function can be employ through the supermodularity properties

Article Details

How to Cite
[1]
Alisam Pavan Kumar, U.Veeresh, and Dr S.Prem Kumar, “A Supermodularity-Based approach for Data Privacy using Differential Privacy Preserving Algorithm”, Int. J. Comput. Eng. Res. Trends, vol. 2, no. 9, pp. 631–635, Sep. 2015.
Section
Research Articles

References

Mohamed R. Fouad, Khaled Elbassioni, ―A Supermodularity-Based Differential Privacy Preserving Algorithm for Data Anonymization , IEEE transaction on Knowledge and Data Engineering July 2014.

M. R. Fouad, K. Elbassioni, and E. Bertino, ―Towards a differentially private data anonymization, Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN, USA, Tech. Rep. CERIAS 2012-1, 2012.

N. Mohammed, R. Chen, B. C. Fung, and P. S. Yu, ―Differentially prívate data release for data mining, in Proc. 17th ACM SIGKDD,New York,NY, USA, 2011, pp. 493–501.

M. R. Fouad, G. Lebanon, and E. Bertino, ―ARUBA: A risk-utility based algorithm for data disclosure, in Proc. VLDB Workshop SDM, Auckland, New Zealand, 2008, pp. 32–49.

K. M. Elbassioni, ―Algorithms for dualization over products of partially ordered sets, SIAM J. Discrete Math., vol. 23, no. 1,pp. 487–510, 2009.

C. Dwork, ―Differential privacy: A survey of results, in Proc. Int.Conf. TAMC, Xiˇ San, China, 2008, pp. 1–19.

G. Lebanon, M. Scannapieco, M. R. Fouad, and E. Bertino,―Beyond kanonymity:A decision theoretic framework for assessing Privacy risk, in Privacy in Statistical Databases. Springer LNCS 4302:217U 232, 2006.

C. Dwork, ―Differential privacy, in Proc. ICALP, Venice, Italy,2006, pp.1–12.

C. C. Aggarwal, ―On k-anonymity and the curse of dimensionality, in Proc. Int. Conf. VLDB, Trondheim, Norway, 2005,pp. 901–909.

C. Dwork, K. Kenthapadi, F. McSherry, I. Mironov, and M. Naor,―Our data, ourselves: Privacy via distributed noise generation, in Proc. 25th EUROCRYPT, Berlin, Germany, 2006, pp. 486–503,LNCS 4004.

A. Frieze, R. Kannan, and N. Polson, ―Sampling from log-concave distributions, Ann. Appl. Probab., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 812–837, 1994.

B. C. M. Fung, K. Wang, and P. S. Yu, ―Top-down specialization for information and privacy preservation, in Proc. IEEE ICDE, Washington, DC, USA, 2005, pp. 205–216.

G. Ghinita, P. Karras, P. Kalnis, and N. Mamoulis, ―Fast data anonymization with low information loss, in Proc. Int. Conf.VLDB, Vienna, Austria, 2007, pp. 758– 769.

G. A. Gratzer, General Lattice Theory, 2nd ed. Basel, Switzerland:Birkh¨auser, 2003.

M. Grotschel, L. Lovasz, and A. Schrijver, ―Geometric algorithms and combinatorial optimization, in Algorithms and Combinatorics, vol. 2, 2nd ed. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 1993.

J. Cao, P. Karras, P. Kalnis, and K.-L. Tan, ―SABRE: A sensitive attribute bucketization and redistribution framework for t-closeness, J. VLDB, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 59–81, 2011.

C. M. Fung, K. Wang, and P. S. Yu, ―Top-down specialization for information and privacy preservation, in Proc. IEEE ICDE, Washington, DC, USA, 2005, pp. 205–216.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>