Uncovering the Impact of Working from Home on Employees’ Collaboration, Happiness, and Promotion Chances Using Machine Learning

Main Article Content

Mehdi Imani


This research explores the impact of working from home on employees' happiness, collaboration, and promotion prospects using machine learning techniques. The study is guided by three research questions aiming to investigate the correlation between working from home and employees' collaboration and promotion prospects. Moreover, the research aims to find a relationship between the number of households and employees' happiness levels while working from home. The data is collected from ICT engineers working at a technology company in Sweden through a questionnaire-based survey. Probability sampling was selected for data collection to reduce bias and enhance the generalizability of the findings. The data is pre-processed and then analysed in Jupyter Notebook using the Python programming language. Various libraries and models, including Pandas, NumPy, Matplotlib, Seaborn, and Scikit-learn, were employed for data analysis. Both Pearson correlation and p-values in Pearson correlation were used in this study to analyse the relationships between different variables. However, based on the results, this study did not find any significant relationship between working from home and employees' promotion prospects or collaboration issues. Additionally, the results did not provide evidence of a significant relationship between the number of households of employees and their happiness levels while working from home.

Article Details

How to Cite
Mehdi Imani, “Uncovering the Impact of Working from Home on Employees’ Collaboration, Happiness, and Promotion Chances Using Machine Learning”, Int. J. Comput. Eng. Res. Trends, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 9–23, Jan. 2024.
Research Articles


Raišiene AG, Rapuano V, Varkulevičiute K, Stachová K. Working from home—Who is happy? A survey of Lithuania’s employees during the COVID-19 quarantine period. Sustainability [Switzerland]. 2020;12[13]. doi:10.3390/su12135332.

Vyas L, Butakhieo N. The impact of working from home during COVID-19 on work and life domains: An exploratory study on Hong Kong. Policy Design and Practice. 2020;4[1]:1–18. doi:10.1080/25741292.2020.1863.

Oakman J, Kinsman N, Stuckey R, Graham M, Weale V. A rapid review of mental and physical health effects of working at home: How do we optimise health? BMC Public Health. 2020;20[1]:1–13. doi:10.1186/s12889-020-09875-z.

International Labour Organization. An Employers’ Guide on Working from Home in Response to the Outbreak of COVID-19. International Labour Organization; 2020. Available from: https://www.ilo.org/actemp/publications/WCMS_745024/lang--en/index.htm.

Hashim R, Bakar A, Noh I, Mahyudin HA. Employees’ Job Satisfaction and Performance through working from Home during the Pandemic Lockdown. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal. 2020;5[15]:461–467. doi:10.21834/ebpj.v5i15.2515.

Jamal MT, Anwar I, Khan NA, Saleem I. Work during COVID-19: Assessing the influence of job demands and resources on practical and psychological outcomes for employees. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration. 2021. doi:10.1108/APJBA-05-2020-0149.

Hering B. Remote work statistics: Shifting norms and expectations. Flexjobs. 2020. Available from: https://www.flexjobs.com/blog/post/remote-work-statistics/.

Dimitrova D. Controlling teleworkers: Supervision and flexibility revisited. New Technology, Work and Employment. 2003;18[3]:181–195. doi:10.1111/1468-005X.00120.

Golden TD, Veiga JF, Dino RN. The impact of professional isolation on teleworker job performance and turnover intentions: Does time spent teleworking, interacting face-to-face, or having access to communication-enhancing technology matter? Journal of Applied Psychology. 2008;93[6]:1412–1421. doi:10.1037/a0012722.

Grant CA, Wallace LM, Spurgeon PC. An exploration of the psychological factors affecting remote e-worker’s job effectiveness, well-being and work-life balance. Employee Relations. 2013;35[5]:527–546. doi:10.1108/ER-08-2012-0059.

Timsal A, Awais M. Flexibility or ethical dilemma: An overview of the work from home policies in modern organizations around the world. Human Resource Management International Digest. 2016;24[7]:12–15. doi:10.1108/HRMID-03-2016-0027.

Anderson D, Kelliher C. Enforced remote working and the work-life interface during lockdown. Gender in Management. 2020;35[7]:677–683. doi:10.1108/GM-07-2020-0224.

Baker E, Avery GC, Crawford J. Satisfaction and perceived productivity when professionals work from home. Research & Practice in Human Resource Management. 2007.

Sahni DJ. Impact of COVID-19 on Employee Behavior: Stress and Coping Mechanism During WFH [Work From Home] Among Service Industry Employees. International Journal of Operations Management. 2020;1[1]:35–48. doi:10.18775//ijom.2757-0509.2020.11.4004.

Bernarto I, Bachtiar D, Sudibjo N, Suryawan IN, Purwanto A, Asbari M. Effect of transformational leadership, perceived organizational support, job satisfaction toward life satisfaction: Evidences from Indonesian teachers. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology. 2020;29[3]:5495–5503.

Kwon M, Jeon SH. Do Leadership Commitment and Performance-Oriented Culture Matter for Federal Teleworker Satisfaction With Telework Programs? Review of Public Personnel Administration. 2020;40[1]:36-55. doi:10.1177/0734371x18776049.

Sridhar V, Bhattacharya S. Significant household factors that influence an IT employees’ job effectiveness while on work from home. International journal of innovation science. 2021;13[1]:105-117.

Van Der Lippe T, Lippényi Z. Co‐workers working from home and individual and team performance. New technology, work and employment. 2020;35[1]:60-79.

Song Y, Gao J. Does telework stress employees out? A study on working at home and subjective well-being for wage/salary workers. Journal of Happiness Studies. 2020;21[7]:2649-2668.

Denscombe M. The good research guide: for small-scale research projects. Maidenhead, Berkshire: McGraw-Hill Education; 2014.

Babbie E. The practice of social research. Cengage Learning. 2010;15.

Bryman A. Social research methods. Oxford university press; 2016.

Creswell JW. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications; 2013.

Suresh K. An overview of randomization techniques: An unbiased assessment of outcome in clinical research. Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences. 2011;4[1]:8–11. doi:10.4103/0974-1208.82352.

Neuman WL. Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Pearson Education; 2013.

Cerda P, Varoquaux G, Kégl B. Similarity encoding for learning with dirty categorical variables. Machine Learning. 2018;107[8-10]:1477-1494.

Sahoo K, Samal AK, Pramanik J, Pani SK. Exploratory data analysis using Python. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering [IJITEE]. 2019;8[12].

Al Jassmi H, Ahmed S, Philip B, Al Mughairbi F, Al Ahmad M. E-happiness physiological indicators of construction workers' productivity: A machine learning approach. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering. 2019;18[6]:517-526.

Field A. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics. 4th ed. Sage Publications; 2013.

Sullivan GM, Artino AR Jr. Analyzing and interpreting data from Likert-type scales. Journal of Graduate Medical Education. 2013;5[4]:541-542. doi:10.4300/JGME-D-13-00154.1.

American Psychological Association. Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. 2017. Available from: https://www.apa.org/ethics/code/.

Fisher CB, Fried AL, Goodman SJ. Ethical issues in dissemination and implementation research. In: Brownson RC, Colditz GA, Proctor EK, editors. Dissemination and implementation research in health: Translating science to practice. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; 2017. p. 571–588.

Imani M, Arabnia HR. Hyperparameter Optimization and Combined Data Sampling Techniques in Machine Learning for Customer Churn Prediction: A Comparative Analysis. Technologies. 2023;11[6]:167.