Impact Factor:6.549
 Scopus Suggested Journal: Tracking ID for this title suggestion is: 55EC484EE39417F0

International Journal
of Computer Engineering in Research Trends (IJCERT)

Scholarly, Peer-Reviewed, Platinum Open Access and Multidisciplinary

Welcome to IJCERT

International Journal of Computer Engineering in Research Trends. Scholarly, Peer-Reviewed, Platinum Open Access and Multidisciplinary

ISSN(Online):2349-7084                 Submit Paper    Check Paper Status    Conference Proposal

Back to Current Issues

An authority: Merchant Lock in to Meta storage

Shaik Murthujavali, P.Kiranrao, Dr.S.Prem Kumar, ,
M.Tech Research Scholar
Assistant Professor
Head of the Department Department Of CSE, G.Pullaiah College of Engineering and Technology. Kurnool JNTU Anatapur, Andhra Pradesh, India

-Expense and versatility advantages of Cloud storage administrations are evident. Notwithstanding, selecting a solitary storage service provider limits accessibility and versatility to the chose supplier and may further cause a merchant lock basically. In this paper, we introduce Meta Storage Capacity, an unified Cloud storage framework that can incorporate differing Cloud storage suppliers. Meta storage Capacity is a very accessible and versatile circulated hash table that imitates information on top of assorted storage service. Meta Capacity reuses instruments from Amazon's Dynamo for cross-supplier replication and thus acquaints a novel methodology with oversee consistency-inactivity tradeoffs by amplifying the customary majority (N; R; W) configurations to an (np; R; W) conspire that incorporates distinctive providers as an extra measurement. With Metastorage, new means to control consistency-inertness tradeoffs are presented.

Shaik Murthujavali,P.Kiranrao,Dr.S.Prem Kumar."An authority: Merchant Lock in to Meta storage". International Journal of Computer Engineering In Research Trends (IJCERT) ,ISSN:2349-7084 ,Vol.1, Issue 04,pp.245-252, OCTOBER - 2014, URL :,

Keywords : Merchant Lock, Meta storage, Meta Storage Nodes

[1] A. Lenk, M. Klems, J. Nimis, S. Tai, and T.
Sandholm, “What’s inside the Cloud? An
architectural map of the Cloud landscape,” in
Software Engineering Challenges of Cloud
Computing, 2009. CLOUD’09. ICSE Workshop on.
IEEE, 2009, pp. 23–31.
[2] C. Baun, M. Kunze, J. Nimis, and S. Tai,Cloud
Computing: Web-basierte dynamische IT-Services,
ser. Informatik im Fokus. Berlin:Springer, 2010.
[3] G. DeCandia, D. Hastorun, M. Jampani, G.
Kakulapati, A. Lakshman,A. Pilchin, S.
Sivasubramanian, P. Vosshall, and W. Vogels,
“Dynamo:amazon’s highly available key value store,”
inProc. SOSP, 2007
[4] M. Welsh, D. Culler, and E. Brewer, “SEDA:
architecture forwell-conditioned, scalable Internet services,”ACM SIGOPS OperatingSystems Review,
vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 230–243, 2001.
[5] S. Garfinkel, “An Evaluation of Amazon’s Grid
Computing Services:EC2, S3, and SQS,” inCenter for.
Citeseer, 2007
[6] A. T. Velte, T. J. Velte, and R. Elsenpeter,Cloud
Computing: A Practical Approach. Upper Saddle
River, NJ: McGraw-Hill, 2010.
[7] D. Nurmi, R. Wolski, C. Grzegorczyk, G. Obertelli,
S. Soman, L. Yous-eff, and D. Zagorodnov, “The
eucalyptus open-source cloud-computing system,” in
Proceedings of the 2009 9th IEEE/ACM International
Symposium on Cluster Computing and the Grid.
IEEE, 2009, pp.124–13
[8] N. Chohan, C. Bunch, S. Pang, C. Krintz, N.
Mostafa, S. Soman,and R. Wolski, “Appscale: Scalable
and open appengine applicationdevelopment and
deployment,”First International Conference on
CloudComputing, 2009.
[9] A. Lakshman and P. Malik, “Cassandra: a
decentralized structuredstorage system,”ACM
SIGOPS Operating Systems Review, vol. 44, no. 2,pp.
35–40, 2010.
[10] R. Thomas, “A majority consensus approach to
concurrency controlfor multiple copy databases,”
ACM Transactions on Database Systems(TODS), vol.
4, no. 2, pp. 180–209, 1979
[11] D. Karger, E. Lehman, T. Leighton, R. Panigrahy,
M. Levine, andD. Lewin, “Consistent hashing and
random trees: Cloud cachingprotocols for relieving
hot spots on the World Wide Web,” in Proceedings of
the twenty-ninth annual ACM symposium on Theory
ofcomputing. ACM, 1997, pp. 654–663.
[12] I. Stoica, R. Morris, D. Karger, M. Kaashoek, and
H. Balakrishnan,“Chord: A scalable peer-to-peer
lookup service for internet applications, “in
Proceedings of the 2001 conference on Applications,
technologies, architectures, and protocols for
computer communications. ACM, 2001,pp. 149–160.
[13] J. Elson and J. Howell, “Handling flash crowds
from your garage,”in USENIX 2008 Annual Technical
Conference on Annual TechnicalConference. USENIX
Association, 2008, pp. 171–184.
[14] S. Bourne, “A conversation with Bruce
Lindsay,”Queue, vol. 2, no. 8,pp. 22–33, 2004.
[15] T. Chandra, R. Griesemer, and J. Redstone,
“Paxos made live: anengineering perspective,”
inProceedings of the twenty-sixth annual
ACMsymposium on Principles of Cloud computing.
ACM, 2007, pp.398–407
[16] L. Lamport, “The part-time parliament,”ACM
Transactions on ComputerSystems (TOCS), vol. 16,
no. 2, pp. 133–169, 1998
[17] H. Weatherspoon, P. Eaton, B. Chun, and J.
Kubiatowicz, “Antiquity:exploiting a secure log for
wide-area Cloud storage,”ACM SIGOPSOperating
Systems Review, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 371–384, 2007.
[18] M. Burrows, “The Chubby lock service for
loosely-coupled Cloudsystems,” in Proceedings of the
7th symposium on Operating systemsdesign and
implementation. USENIX Association, 2006, pp. 335–
[19] A. Adya, W. Bolosky, M. Castro, G. Cermak, R.
Chaiken, J. Douceur,J. Howell, J. Lorch, M. Theimer,
and R. Wattenhofer, “FARSITE:Federated, available,
and reliable storage for an incompletely
trustedenvironment,”ACM SIGOPS Operating
Systems Review, vol. 36, no. SI, pp. 1–14, 2002
[20] K. Bowers, A. Juels, and A. Oprea, “HAIL: A
high-availability andintegrity layer for cloud
storage,” in Proceedings of the 16th ACMconference
on Computer and communications security. ACM,
2009,pp. 187–198.
[21] J. Kubiatowicz, D. Bindel, Y. Chen, S. Czerwinski,
P. Eaton, D. Geels,R. Gummadi, S. Rhea, H.
Weatherspoon, C. Wellset al., “Oceanstore: An
architecture for global-scale persistent storage,”ACM
SIGARCH Computer Architecture News, vol. 28, no.
5, pp. 190–201, 2000
[22] Google, Datastore Performance Growing Pains.
Google, Jun.2010, (accessed on December 4, 2010).
[Online]. Available:
re-perfor mance-growing-pains.html
[23] C. Bunch, N. Chohan, C. Krintz, J. Chohan, J.
Kupferman, P. Lakhina,Y. Li, and Y. Nomura, “An
evaluation of Cloud datastores using the appscale
cloud platform,” in Cloud Computing (CLOUD),
2010 IEEE3rd International Conference on, 2010, pp.
305 –312
[24] Broberg, Buyya, and Tari, “Creating a Cloud
Storage Mashup forHigh Performance, Low Cost
Content Delivery,” inService-OrientedComputing–
ICSOC 2008 Workshops. Springer, 2009, pp. 178–183.
[25] J. Broberg, R. Buyya, and Z. Tari, “MetaCDN:
Harnessing ’StorageClouds’ for high performance
content delivery,”Journal of Network andComputer
Applications, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 1012–1022, 2009
[26] H. Abu-Libdeh, L. Princehouse, and H.
Weatherspoon, “RACS: a casefor cloud storage
diversity,” in Proceedings of the 1st ACM
symposiumon Cloud computing. ACM, 2010, pp.
[27] H. Weatherspoon and J. Kubiatowicz, “Erasure
coding vs. replication:A quantitative
comparison,”Peer-to-Peer Systems, pp. 328–337, 2002.
[28] W. Vogels, Eventually Consistent - Revisited,
Dec. 2008,(accessed on October 19, 2010). [Online].
entually _consistent.html


Download :

Refbacks : Currently there are no Refbacks

Support Us

We have kept IJCERT is a free peer-reviewed scientific journal to endorse conservation. We have not put up a paywall to readers, and we do not charge for publishing. But running a monthly journal costs is a lot. While we do have some associates, we still need support to keep the journal flourishing. If our readers help fund it, our future will be more secure.

Quick Links


Science Central

Score: 13.30

Submit your paper to