Impact Factor:6.549
 Scopus Suggested Journal: UNDER REVIEW for TITLE INCLUSSION

International Journal
of Computer Engineering in Research Trends (IJCERT)

Scholarly, Peer-Reviewed, Open Access and Multidisciplinary

Welcome to IJCERT

International Journal of Computer Engineering in Research Trends. Scholarly, Peer-Reviewed,Open Access and Multidisciplinary

ISSN(Online):2349-7084                 Submit Paper    Check Paper Status    Conference Proposal

Back to Current Issues

Audit Free Cloud Storage via Deniable attribute based Encryption

C.Anusha, M.Srilakshmi, Dr. S.Prem Kumar , ,
Pursuing M.Tech, CSE Branch, Dept of CSE
Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Professor & HOD, Department of computer science and engineering, G.Pullaiah College of Engineering and Technology, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Cloud storage services have grow popularly. For the importance reason of privacy, many cloud storage encryption schemas has been proposed to secure the data from those who do not have access. All such schemes assumes that cloud storage providers are secure and cannot be hacked. However in practice, some authorities may compel cloud storage providers to make public user secrets and confidential data. We consider the problem of building a secure cloud storage service on top of a public cloud infrastructure where the service provider is not completely trusted by the customer. In this paper a new cloud storage encryption schema is proposed which allows cloud storage providers to protect user privacy. Since authorities cannot tell the obtained secrets are true or false, the cloud storage providers ensure that the user privacy is still securely provided. The proposed schemes believe cloud storage service providers or trusted third parties handling key management are trusted and cannot be hacked. Some times may intercept the communication between users and cloud storage providers and then compel storage providers to release user secrets by using government power or other means. In this case the encrypted data are assumed to be known and storage providers are requested to release user secrets. The proposed Deniable CP-ABE scheme is to build an Audit free cloud storage service. The deniability feature makes coercion invalid, and the ABE property ensures secure cloud data sharing with a fine grained access controlled mechanism.

C.Anusha,M.Srilakshmi,Dr. S.Prem Kumar."Audit Free Cloud Storage via Deniable attribute based Encryption". International Journal of Computer Engineering In Research Trends (IJCERT) ,ISSN:2349-7084 ,Vol.2, Issue 11,pp.722-726, November- 2015, URL :,

Keywords : cloud storage, service providers, key management, attributes based Encryption, Deniable Encryption process.

[1] A. Sahai and B. Waters, “Fuzzy identity-based encryption,” in Eurocrypt, 2005, pp. 457–473. 
[2] V. Goyal, O. Pandey, A. Sahai, and B. Waters, “Attribute-based encryption for fine-grained access control of encrypted data,” in ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, 2006, pp. 89–98.  
[3] J. Bethencourt, A. Sahai, and B. Waters, “Ciphertext-policy attribute-based encryption,” in IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 2007, pp. 321–334. 
[4] B. Waters, “Ciphertext-policy attribute-based encryption: An expressive, efficient, and provably secure realization,” in Public Key Cryptography, 2011, pp. 53–70.
 [5] A. Sahai, H. Seyalioglu, and B. Waters, “Dynamic credentials and ciphertext delegation for attribute-based encryption,” in Crypto, 2012, pp. 199–217. 
[6] S. Hohenberger and B. Waters, “Attribute-based encryption with fast decryption,” in Public Key Cryptography, 2013, pp. 162–179. 
[7] P. K. Tysowski and M. A. Hasan, “Hybrid attribute- and reencryption-based key management for secure and scalable mobile applications in clouds.” IEEE T. Cloud Computing, pp. 172–186, 2013.
 [8] Wired. (2014) Spam suspect uses google docs; fbi happy. [Online]. Available:
 [9] Wikipedia. (2014) Global surveillance disclosures (2013present). [Online]. Available: surveillance disclosures (2013-present)


Download :

Refbacks : Currently there are no Refbacks


Authors are not required to pay any article-processing charges (APC) for their article to be published open access in Journal IJCERT. No charge is involved in any stage of the publication process, from administrating peer review to copy editing and hosting the final article on dedicated servers. This is free for all authors. 

News & Events

Latest issue :Volume 10 Issue 1 Articles In press

A plagiarism check will be implemented for all the articles using world-renowned software. Turnitin.

Digital Object Identifier will be assigned for all the articles being published in the Journal from September 2016 issue, i.e. Volume 3, Issue 9, 2016.

IJCERT is a member of the prestigious.Each of the IJCERT articles has its unique DOI reference.
DOI Prefix : 10.22362/ijcert

IJCERT is member of The Publishers International Linking Association, Inc. (“PILA”)

Emerging Sources Citation Index (in process)

IJCERT title is under evaluation by Scopus.

Key Dates

☞   LAST DATE OF SUBMISSION : 31st March 2023
In 7 Days

Important Announcements

All the authors, conference coordinators, conveners, and guest editors kindly check their articles' originality before submitting them to IJCERT. If any material is found to be duplicate submission or sent to other journals when the content is in the process with IJCERT, fabricated data, cut and paste (plagiarized), at any stage of processing of material, IJCERT is bound to take the following actions.
1. Rejection of the article.
2. The author will be blocked for future communication with IJCERT if duplicate articles are submitted.
3. A letter regarding this will be posted to the Principal/Director of the Institution where the study was conducted.
4. A List of blacklisted authors will be shared among the Chief Editors of other prestigious Journals
We have been screening articles for plagiarism with a world-renowned tool: Turnitin However, it is only rejected if found plagiarized. This more stern action is being taken because of the illegal behavior of a handful of authors who have been involved in ethical misconduct. The Screening and making a decision on such articles costs colossal time and resources for the journal. It directly delays the process of genuine materials.

Citation Index

Citations Indices All
Citations 1026
h-index 14
i10-index 20
Source: Google Scholar

Acceptance Rate (By Year)

Acceptance Rate (By Year)
Year Rate
2021 10.8%
2020 13.6%
2019 15.9%
2018 14.5%
2017 16.6%
2016 15.8%
2015 18.2%
2014 20.6%

Important Links

Conference Proposal