Deniable Access Control for Multi-Authority Cloud Storage
Ch.Anusha, A.Harshavardhan, , ,
Affiliations M.Tech (CSE), Priyadarshini Institute of Technology & Science for womenâ€™sAssistant Professor ( Dept.of CSE), Priyadarshini Institute of Technology & Science for Womenâ€™s
Now days, plenty of users are storing their dataâ€™s in cloud, as a result of it provides storage flexibility. However the most
downside in cloud is information security. Information access management is efficient thanks to make sure the information security within
the cloud. Because of information outsourcing and untrusted cloud servers, the information access management becomes a difficult
issue in cloud storage systems. Cipher text-Policy Attribute based mostly encoding (CP-ABE) is thought to be one in every of the
foremost appropriate technologies for information access management in cloud storage, as a result of it provides information
homeowners additional direct management on access policies. However, it's tough to directly apply existing CP-ABE schemes to
information access management for cloud storage systems as a result of the attribute revocation downside. during this paper, we have a
tendency to style associate degree communicative , economical and voidable information access management theme for multi-authority
cloud storage systems, wherever there are multiple authorities co-exist and every authority is in a position to issue attributes severally.
Specifically, we have a tendency to propose a voidable multi-authority CP-ABE theme, and apply it because the underlying techniques to
style the information access management theme. Our attribute revocation methodology will with efficiency bring home the bacon each
forward security and backward security. The analysis and simulation results show that our projected information access management
theme is secure within the random oracle model and is additional economical than previous works.
Ch.Anusha,A.Harshavardhan."Deniable Access Control for Multi-Authority Cloud Storage". International Journal of Computer Engineering In Research Trends (IJCERT) ,ISSN:2349-7084 ,Vol.2, Issue 10,pp.861-866, October- 2015, URL :https://ijcert.org/ems/ijcert_papers/V2I1013.pdf,
 M. Chase, â€˜â€˜Multi-Authority Attribute Based Encryption,â€™â€™ in Proc. 4th Theory of Cryptography Conf. Theory of Cryptography (TCCâ€™07), 2007, pp. 515-534.
 M. Chase and S.S.M. Chow, â€˜â€˜Improving Privacy and Security in Multi-Authority Attribute-Based Encryption,â€™â€™ in Proc.16thACM Conf. Computer and Comm. Security (CCSâ€™09),2009, pp. 121-130.
 A.B. Lewko and B. Waters, â€˜â€˜Decentralizing Attribute- Based Encryption,â€™â€™ in Proc. Advances in Cryptology-EUROCRYPTâ€™11, 2011, pp. 568-588.
 S. Yu, C. Wang, K. Ren, and W. Lou, â€˜â€˜Attribute Based Data Sharing with Attribute Revocation,â€™â€™ in Proc. 5th ACM Symp. Information, Computer and Comm. Security (ASIACCSâ€™10), 2010, pp. 261-270.
 M. Li, S. Yu, Y. Zhen, K. Ren, and. Lou, â€˜â€˜Scalable and Secure Sharing of Personal Health Records in Cloud Computing Using Attribute-Based Encryption,â€™â€™ IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Systems, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 131-143, Jan. 2013.
 J. Hurl and D.K. Noh, â€˜â€˜Attribute-Based Access Control with Efficient Revocation in Data Outsourcing Systems,â€™â€™ IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Systems, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 1214-1221, July 2011.
 S. Jahid, P. Mittal, and N. Borisov, â€˜â€˜Easier: Encryption-Based Access Control in Social Networks with Efficient Revocation,â€™â€™ in Proc. 6th ACM Symp. Information, Computer and Comm. Security (ASIACCSâ€™11), 2011, pp. 411-415.
 S. Ruj, A. Nayak, and I. Stojmenovic, â€˜â€˜DACC: Distributed Access Control in Clouds,â€™â€™ in Proc. 10th IEEE Intâ€™l Conf.TrustCom, 2011, pp. 91-98.
 K. Yang and X. Jia, â€˜â€˜Attribute-Based Access Control for Multi-Authority Systems in Cloud Storage,â€™â€™ in Proc.32th IEEE Intâ€™l Conf. Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCSâ€™12), 2012, pp. 1-10.
 D. Boneh and M.K. Franklin, â€˜â€˜Identity-Based Encryption from the Weil pairing,â€™â€™ in Proc. 21st Ann. Intâ€™l CryptologyConf.: Advances in Cryptology - CRYPTOâ€™01, 2001, pp.213-229.
 A.B. Lewko and B. Waters, â€˜â€˜New Proof Methods for Attribute-Based Encryption: Achieving Full Security through Selective Techniques,â€™â€™ in Proc. 32st Ann. Intâ€™l Cryptology Conf.: Advances in Cryptology - CRYPTOâ€™12, 2012, pp. 180-198.
 P. Mell and T. Grace, â€˜â€˜The NIST Definition of Cloud Computing,â€™â€™ National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA, Tech. Rep., 2009.
Authors are not required to pay any article-processing charges (APC) for their article to be published open access in Journal IJCERT. No charge is involved in any stage of the publication process, from administrating peer review to copy editing and hosting the final article on dedicated servers. This is free for all authors.
News & Events
Latest issue :Volume 10 Issue 1 Articles In press
☞ INVITING SUBMISSIONS FOR THE NEXT ISSUE :
☞ LAST DATE OF SUBMISSION : 31st March 2023
☞ SUBMISSION TO FIRST DECISION : In 7 Days
☞ FINAL DECISION : IN 3 WEEKS FROM THE DAY OF SUBMISSION
All the authors, conference coordinators, conveners, and guest editors kindly check their articles' originality before submitting them to IJCERT. If any material is found to be duplicate submission or sent to other journals when the content is in the process with IJCERT, fabricated data, cut and paste (plagiarized), at any stage of processing of material, IJCERT is bound to take the following actions.
1. Rejection of the article.
2. The author will be blocked for future communication with IJCERT if duplicate articles are submitted.
3. A letter regarding this will be posted to the Principal/Director of the Institution where the study was conducted.
4. A List of blacklisted authors will be shared among the Chief Editors of other prestigious Journals
We have been screening articles for plagiarism with a world-renowned tool: Turnitin However, it is only rejected if found plagiarized. This more stern action is being taken because of the illegal behavior of a handful of authors who have been involved in ethical misconduct. The Screening and making a decision on such articles costs colossal time and resources for the journal. It directly delays the process of genuine materials.