Cloud computing is that the latest distributed computing model and it offers big opportunities to resolve large-scale scientific issues. However, it presents varied challenges that require to be addressed so as to be with efficiency utilized for progress applications. Although the advancement programing downside has been wide studied, there area unit only a few initiatives tailored for cloud environments. Furthermore, the present works fail to either meet the user’s quality of service (QOS) needs or to include some basic principles of cloud computing like the physical property and no uniformity of the computing resources. This paper proposes a resource provisioning and programing strategy for scientific workflows on Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) clouds. we tend to gift associate algorithm supported the meta-heuristic improvement technique, particle swarm improvement (PSO), that aims to reduce the general workflow execution value whereas meeting point in time constraints. Our heuristic is evaluated victimization CloudSim and numerous wellknown scientific workflows of various sizes. The results show that our approach performs higher than the present progressive algorithms.

Chetana Pradip Shravage,Dr. S.T. Singh."Combined Resource Provisioning and Scheduling Strategy for execution of scientific workflows on Cloud Level of IaaS". International Journal of Computer Engineering In Research Trends (IJCERT) ,ISSN:2349-7084 ,Vol.2, Issue 10,pp.694-698, OCTOBER - 2015, URL :https://ijcert.org/ems/ijcert_papers/V2I1008.pdf,

[1] G. Juve, A. Chervenak, E. Deelman, S. Bharathi, G. Mehta, and K. Vahi, ―Characterizing and profiling scientific workflows,‖ Future Generation Comput. Syst., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 682–692, 2012. 
[2] P. Mell, T. Grance, ―The NIST definition of cloud computing— recommendations of the National Institute of Standards and Technology‖ Special Publication 800-145, NIST, Gaithersburg, 2011. 
[3] R. Buyya, J. Broberg, and A. M. Goscinski, Eds., Cloud Computing: Principles and Paradigms, vol. 87, Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2010.
 [4] J. Kennedy and R. Eberhart, ―Particle swarm optimization,‖ in Proc. 6th IEEE Int. Conf. Neural Netw., 1995, pp. 1942–1948. 
[5] Y. Fukuyama and Y. Nakanishi, ―A particle swarm optimization for reactive power and voltage control considering voltage stability,‖ in Proc. 11th IEEE Int. Conf. Intell. Syst. Appl. Power Syst., 1999, pp. 117–121. 
[6] C. O. Ourique, E. C. Biscaia Jr., and J. C. Pinto, ―The use of particle swarm optimization for dynamical analysis in chemical processes,‖ Comput. Chem. Eng., vol. 26, no. 12, pp. 1783–1793, 2002. 
[7] T. Sousa, A. Silva, and A. Neves, ―Particle swarm based data mining algorithms for classification tasks,‖ Parallel Comput., vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 767–783, 2004.
 [8] M. R. Garey and D. S. Johnson, Computer and Intractability: A Guide to the NP-Completeness, vol. 238, New York, NY, USA: Freeman, 1979.
 [9] M. Rahman, S. Venugopal, and R. Buyya, ―A dynamic critical path algorithm for scheduling scientific workflow applications on global grids,‖ in Proc. 3rd IEEE Int. Conf. eSci. Grid Computing., 2007, pp. 35–42. 
[10] Maria Alejandra Rodriguez and Rajkumar Buyya, ―Deadline based Resource provisioning and Scheduling Algorithm for scientific workflows on clouds‖, IEEE Transaction on cloud computing, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 222-235, April-June 2014.