Impact Factor:6.549
 Scopus Suggested Journal: UNDER REVIEW for TITLE INCLUSSION

International Journal
of Computer Engineering in Research Trends (IJCERT)

Scholarly, Peer-Reviewed, Open Access and Multidisciplinary

Welcome to IJCERT

International Journal of Computer Engineering in Research Trends. Scholarly, Peer-Reviewed,Open Access and Multidisciplinary

ISSN(Online):2349-7084                 Submit Paper    Check Paper Status    Conference Proposal

Back to Current Issues

Various Obstruction Removal Techniques from a Sequence of Images

Miss Ashwini Gat, Mr. Uday Nuli, Mr. Sandip Murchite, ,
Computer Science & Engineering, TEI’s DKTE, Ichakaranji, 416115/416115, India
:10.22362/ijcert/2017/v4/i3/xxxx [UNDER PROCESS]

Reflection or obstruction from images is a major reason for quality degradation of images in image processing. Camera Flash is frequently used to capture a good photograph of a scene under low light conditions. However, flash images have many problems: The flash can often be blinding and too strong, leading to blown out images. This report presents separate algorithms described in the literature that attempts to remove obstructions computationally. The strengths and weaknesses of each algorithm outlined.

Ashwini Gat, “Various Obstruction Removal Techniques from a Sequence of Images”, International Journal Of Computer Engineering In Research Trends, 4(3):86-88, March-2017.

Keywords : flash, reflection removal, obstruction, SPBSM, SID, GPSR.

[1]	K. Gai, Z. Shi, and C. Zhang. Blind separation of superimposed moving images using image statistics. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 34(1):19–32, Jan 2012.

[2]	X. Guo, X. Cao, and Y. Ma. Robust separation of reflection from multiple images. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2014 IEEE Conference on, pages 2195–2202, June 2014.

[3]	Levin, A. Zomet, and Y.Weiss. Separating reflections from a single image using local features. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2004. CVPR 2004. Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Computer Society Conference on, Volume 1, pages I–306–I–313 Vol.1, June 2004

[4]	Y. Shih, D. Krishnan, F. Durand, and W. Freeman. Reflection removal using ghosting cues. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2015 IEEE Conference on, pages 3193– 3201, June 2015.

[5]	S. N. Sinha, J. Kopf, M. Goesele, D. Scharstein, and R. Szeliski. Image-based rendering for scenes with reflections. In ACM Trans. Graph. (August 2012). ACM SIGGRAPH, August 2012.

[6]	A. K. Jain, “Fundamentals of Digital Image Processing” Prentice-Hall, 1986, p 384.

[7]	Amit Agrawal Ramesh Raskar Shree K. Nayar† Yuanzhen Li Mitsubishi “Removing Photography Artifacts using Gradient Projection and Flash-Exposure Sampling” Electric Research Labs (MERL), Cambridge, MA_ †Columbia University

[8]	Li Michael S. Brown “Exploiting Reflection Change for Automatic Reflection Removal” Yu School of Computing, National University of Singapore |

[9]	B.himabindu (Asst. professor, Department of E.C.E, Chalapathi Institute of Technology, Guntur, A.P, India). “Removal of Shadows and Reflections in the Images By Using Cross-Projection Tensors” IOSR Journal of Engineering (IOSRJEN) ISSN: 2250-3021 Volume 2, Issue 8 (August 2012), PP 34-40 34|Page 

[10]	 Mário A. T. Figueiredo, Senior Member IEEE, Robert D. Nowak, Senior Member, IEEE, and Stephen J. Wright “Gradient Projection for Sparse Reconstruction: Application to Compressed Sensing and Other Inverse Problems” IEEE journal of selected topics in signal processing, vol. 1, no. 4, december 2007.
[11]	A. Levin, A. Zomet, and Y. Weiss. “Separating reflections from a single image using local features”. In CVPR, 2004. [7]Song,Bo; Gong,shenwen; Ren,chunjian “Removing artifacts using gradient projection from a single image”. MIPPR 2011: Pattern Recognition and Computer Vision. Edited by Roberts, Jonathan; Ma, Jie. Proceedings of the SPIE, Volume 8004, article id. 80041C, 6 pp. (2011). (SPIE homepage). 

DOI Link : Not yet assigned

Download :

Refbacks : There are currently no refbacks


Authors are not required to pay any article-processing charges (APC) for their article to be published open access in Journal IJCERT. No charge is involved in any stage of the publication process, from administrating peer review to copy editing and hosting the final article on dedicated servers. This is free for all authors. 

News & Events

Latest issue :Volume 10 Issue 1 Articles In press

A plagiarism check will be implemented for all the articles using world-renowned software. Turnitin.

Digital Object Identifier will be assigned for all the articles being published in the Journal from September 2016 issue, i.e. Volume 3, Issue 9, 2016.

IJCERT is a member of the prestigious.Each of the IJCERT articles has its unique DOI reference.
DOI Prefix : 10.22362/ijcert

IJCERT is member of The Publishers International Linking Association, Inc. (“PILA”)

Emerging Sources Citation Index (in process)

IJCERT title is under evaluation by Scopus.

Key Dates

☞   LAST DATE OF SUBMISSION : 31st March 2023
In 7 Days

Important Announcements

All the authors, conference coordinators, conveners, and guest editors kindly check their articles' originality before submitting them to IJCERT. If any material is found to be duplicate submission or sent to other journals when the content is in the process with IJCERT, fabricated data, cut and paste (plagiarized), at any stage of processing of material, IJCERT is bound to take the following actions.
1. Rejection of the article.
2. The author will be blocked for future communication with IJCERT if duplicate articles are submitted.
3. A letter regarding this will be posted to the Principal/Director of the Institution where the study was conducted.
4. A List of blacklisted authors will be shared among the Chief Editors of other prestigious Journals
We have been screening articles for plagiarism with a world-renowned tool: Turnitin However, it is only rejected if found plagiarized. This more stern action is being taken because of the illegal behavior of a handful of authors who have been involved in ethical misconduct. The Screening and making a decision on such articles costs colossal time and resources for the journal. It directly delays the process of genuine materials.

Citation Index

Citations Indices All
Citations 1026
h-index 14
i10-index 20
Source: Google Scholar

Acceptance Rate (By Year)

Acceptance Rate (By Year)
Year Rate
2021 10.8%
2020 13.6%
2019 15.9%
2018 14.5%
2017 16.6%
2016 15.8%
2015 18.2%
2014 20.6%

Important Links

Conference Proposal